Posts Tagged ‘pentagon’

hotkministry
Uploaded on Jul 3, 2011

It has begun.

Rod Serling! WoOt!

I love Rod Serling. His awesome imagination and exceptional creativity played a very large part in shaping my mind. For that I am grateful to him. The Twilight Zone… Rocks!

And here he is… narrating this rather well done UFO documentary, infusing it with his inimitable style. Not only that, it also features Dr. Jacques Vallee; and two other very nice people, Mr. José Ferrer and… Mr. Burgess Meredith! Whee! How cool is that?

The film was originally released in 1974 as UFOs: Past, Present and Future with Rod narrating. It won a Golden Globe Award. This is the updated version released in 1979 with the new title. I do not know what the ‘update’ consisted of, however, as I have not seen it. Hadn’t seen this one before, either, actually, until last night via a thread by Karl 12.

The film was produced by Allan F. Sandler, directed by Ray Rivas and written by well known UFO researcher Robert Emenegger, who also composed the musical score.

There is a treasure trove of rarely, if ever, seen historical footage and interviews with some significant individuals and witnesses. It is long, but if you have an interest in this subject it is decidedly worth the watch.

It is said that there was US Government co-operation in the production of this film… and that claim is evidenced by the inclusion of interesting interview footage filmed inside the Pentagon. That interview is with Colonel Bill Coleman, Chief of Public Information for the US Air Force from 1969 to 1974.

Well, now. I have heard as may you have, too, of cases where official help is offered as a lure of some sort, perhaps and then reneged on. It may just be that the reneging was not fully implemented in the case of Mr. Emenegger.

From this fine page at Ron Schmidt’s Pegasus Research Consortium site, we note this, quoted thereon, from here

The Holloman AFB UFO landing event was featured in Robert Emenegger’s/Alan Sandler’s 1974 documentary ‘UFO’s: Past, Present and Future’, and in an updated 1979 version ‘UFOs: It Has Begun’. These documentaries were both narrated by Rod Serling. Towards the end of the documentary, a ‘what if’ scenario was presented to the viewer about a landing that could happen in the future, or perhaps already could have happened…

“Let us look at an incident that might happen in the future, or perhaps could have happened already. The premise is that contact is made by extraterrestrial beings with representatives of the United States Air Force at Holloman Air Force Base in the deserts of New Mexico.”

Rod Serling goes on to narrate the Holloman landing event which consisted of illustrations of the landing and the aliens meeting Air Force officials. These illustrations were inter-cut with actual footage from the base. At one point in the re-enactment there is footage of a strange white-yellowish object descending towards the base, with the mountains in the background (some people have suggested it is part of the authentic UFO landing tape that slipped though).

From a 2005 pdf file by Steve Johnson giving a blow-by-blow description of the film we read this…

It is said that the producers of the film were promised unprecedented cooperation from the US military, and the inclusion of many military reports and interviews seems to confirm that suggestion. It is also said that actual footage from a real incident at Holloman AFB would be provided to them and that this would be used as the startling finale to the programme. Unfortunately, it seems the authorities got cold feet and we ended up with some hastily-prepared footage and artwork. But was it all a fiction? During the segment, we are shown a bright light descending towards the desert. Is this a real UFO, or just an out-of-focus aircraft coming in to land?

Why are specific names used, exact times and usage of precise amounts of film? What is the King One area at Holloman AFB? Apparently, in the novelisation of the film, the King One area is described as being on Mars Street in Building 930. I have been unable as yet to find a plan of the AFB with Mars Street or Building 930 noted.

And from an article (in pdf) called A History of Government Management of UFO Perceptions through Film and Television, we read…

There was more comprehensive, high-level cooperation from the DoD for the production of one particularly unusual film, though – the documentary, UFOs: Past, Present and Future (1974), which considered the extra-terrestrial hypothesis in a much more serious light. The film’s director, Robert Emenegger, was given unprecedented access to DoD facilities, including the highly sensitive Holloman Air Force Base and the Pentagon itself. “The Secretary of the Air Force [Robert Seamans] gave the order to co-operate,” explained the director, who was granted time with highranking military officers apparently well-versed in UFO-related matters, among them Colonel William Coleman, a former spokesman for Project Blue Book, and Colonel George Weinbrenner, then head of Foreign Technology at Wright Patterson Air Force Base.

The film even included a detailed reconstruction of what Emenegger claims the USAF told him was a real extraterrestrial landing at Holloman Air Force Base in 1971, complete with artistic renderings of the alleged aliens.

The USAF even provided Emenegger with a few seconds of footage showing what appeared to be an unusual, bright object descending slowly and vertically over the base. These frames, Emenegger claims, were taken from the “genuine” alien landing footage and officially authorised for use in his completed documentary, which, in line with a 49th Parallel, Vol. 25 (Spring 2011) Graham & Alford ISSN: 1753-5794 (online) 14 recommendation by the USAF, presented the incident as “one that might happen in the future – or perhaps could have happened already.”74 Emenegger claims that he was approached by the USAF to initiate this project, which would be in line with his scholarly interest in propaganda, his history as a Vice President at Grey Advertising, and his personal involvement in the Nixon Campaign to Re-Elect the President (CREEP).75 The film also received support from the Army, the Navy and NASA, with the latter furnishing Emenegger’s production with previously unreleased photographs of what appeared to be UFOs taken in space by Gemini astronauts..

Fascinating!

Seems legit, too, at least to this tired mind.

Oh, by the way, here is Angelia Joiner’s Interview with Robert Emenegger at the 2008 X-Conference.

I dunno… I love this stuff. Maybe someday I’ll even go so far as to write up my own sightings…

Anyway, enjoy!

Peace.

Advertisements

Wow! Double Wow! Finally! The following excerpt is from an excellent article by Len Hart that I just found at his The Existentialist Cowboy blog.

Read the complete article. Seriously.

I am a strong supporter of the work that Craig Ranke and his Citizen Investigation Team (CIT) have done regarding events at the Pentagon. They’ve incontrovertibly shown that an airliner simply could not have hit the Pentagon and that the damage to the building concurs with that fact. They’ve also proven to my satisfaction that the ‘downed’ light poles and the ludicrous taxi incident were staged. Ranke feels that explosives in the building caused the damage and that no aircraft of any kind struck.

With what little evidence we have from the scene, along with Rumsfeld stating that a missile hit the building, my brain’s turning all kinds of ways…

It is within the realm of plausibility that the decoy plane seen up close and personal by the eyewitnesses interviewed by CIT, which was seen flying away behind the fireball by a witness they interviewed, was timed to coincide with the arrival of a device described by one person on the news that day as “a missile, with wings.” Keep in mind that none, yes, none, of the people heard from in the news coverage on that day were “regular guys,” but instead all employees of the media giants.

The article’s main story is the fact that American Airlines itself has finally told the truth, (in the most subtle way possible) and owned up to the fact that those flights so critical to the official story never happened.  Thank you AA for living up to your name. That’s huge. And without those planes being in the air, the entire government line falls to dust, just like the thousands of innocent people they killed in carrying out their sick “new Pearl Harbor.”

I like this Len Hart. He thinks like me and our attitudes seen similar in more than one area. Also covered in the article are many of the other aspects of 9/11 including the revelation by United Airlines on the day that the alleged Shanksville plane had landed in Cleveland, the towers, mainstream media’s apparent difficulty in keeping to the timeline of their scripts, and what we’d all like to see happen. There are a bunch of good comments and there’s a nice list of resources to cap it off.

Ready? Here you go…

THURSDAY, JULY 02, 2009

AA Exposes Bush’s ‘Big Lie’: Flight 11 DID NOT FLY on 911!

by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

American Airlines itself is the source for information that AA Flights 11 (North Tower) and 77 (Pentagon) did not fly on 911. These flights are critical to the the government’s crumbling cover up! Without those flights, Bush and his murderous co-conspirators will have to revise the big lie. They will have to concoct yet another cover story from the ground up! A cover up is on the brink of collapse when those guilty of capital crimes and high treason either turn on one another or are forced to revise the lie! If neither flight was in the air as American Airlines itself has so stated, then numerous ‘official versions’ of the ‘official conspiracy theory’ are all a pack of malicious lies. That includes almost every statement made by Bush. It is, in my opinion, probable cause to indict Bush and his co-conspirators for the crimes of mass murder and high treason.

WikiScanner discovered that American Airlines changed their Wikipedia entry to state that Flights 11 and 77 did not fly on 9/11. The original entry was as follows:

Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack: American Airlines Flight 77 (a Boeing 757) and American Airlines Flight 11 (a Boeing 767).

New entry is as follows and includes the bolded text below:

Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack: Flight 77 (a Boeing 757) and Flight 11 (a Boeing 767).

Although these flights were daily departures before and a month after September 11, 2001. Neither flight 11 nor 77 were scheduled on September 11, 2001. The records kept by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (www.bts.gov/gis/) do not list either flight that day. —Wikipedia

To make the point: the source for these change is American Airlines by making changes to Wikipedia. The ‘story’ is not Wiki. The story is not about Wiki. The story is about how AA ‘corrected’ a wiki entry. The story is about the fact that the evidence that Flights 11 and 77 were not flying on 911 comes from American Airlines itself.

According to a Freedom of Information Act reply from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), the last known pre-9/11 flights for three of the four aircraft involved in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 took place in December, 2000, nine months before the attacks, while no pre-9/11 final flight information was provided for American Airlines flight 77 (N644AA).

However, a searchable online BTS database produces the following search results for three of the four 9/11 aircraft on September 10, 2001:

AA 11 departs San Francisco (SFO): AA 09/10/2001 0198 (flight number) N334AA (tail number) BOS (destination) 22:04 (wheels-off time)

UA 175 departs San Francisco (SFO): UA 09/10/2001 0170 (flight number) N612UA (tail number) BOS (destination) 13:44 (wheels-off time)

UA 93 departs San Francisco (SFO): UA 09/10/2001 0078 (flight number) N591UA (tail number) EWR (destination) 23:15 (wheels-off time)–911 Blogger, UPDATE: U.S. BTS FOIA Records For 9/11 Planes Differ From BTS Online Database [The records were obtained by Adrian Monaghan]

Anyone trying to prove that Flights 77 and 11 were not flying on 911 would have to verify that proposition through authoritative sources that could confirm it. The question is raised: how do we know who made the changes to Wiki? Everyone logged on to the internet does so from an IP address. In this case, the IP is that of American Airlines. It’s traceable.

My own WHOIS lookup as well as a Google search of the IP address proves conclusively that it was –indeed –American Airlines itself that made the change. It is American Airlines –by way of Wiki –that has said that neither Flight 11 nor Flight 77 were in the air that day.

Therefore, the Bush theory of 911 is a deliberate lie. My look up returned the following: […]

Continue reading the article, as it gets ever so much deeper. Ever so much.

We must insist, and I mean insist, on bringing these heinous, treasonous, murdering thugs to justice. What they did not only ruined America, but ruined the whole damn world. I personally feel that Obama is just another Bush, working to further the criminal aims set forth before him… and so far his actions would seem to indicate just that. Maybe this will prompt him into foregoing his handler’s orders and boldly taking actions that We The People will be truly proud of.

This is Citizen Investigation Team’s latest compilation regarding the psy-op false-flag attack known as 9/11, made from the massive amounts of evidence they’ve gathered – independent, verifiable evidence – via in-person investigation over the last three years or so. Said evidence has always been thoroughly researched and well presented. It also destroys, utterly and without question, the government’s and media’s well-scripted line of horse-pucky.

It’s pretty much all covered here within these 81 minutes – the true path of the plane, why it couldn’t have done what it was alleged to do, the staging of certain side attractions, including the ludicrous taxicab story… all of the juicy highlights.

I’ve always thought the score that they’d had with obtaining the direct evidence for the staging of the lightpoles was a standout. Sadly, the man who recorded said evidence and gave it away was found shortly after… “suicided” …at a young age, leaving a young family torn apart.

His photographic legacy demonstrates quite clearly that pole number one was not there as the bombs that made the holes in the building went off and as the jet that drew all eyes made its well hidden getaway. Not quite that well hidden, however, as, fortunately, a Pentagon police officer reported seeing it… although not having high enough clearance meant he didn’t quite realize exactly what he was looking at. Quite understandable. Actually, it’s so, so good that he didn’t have high enough clearance… as he could therefore tell us his truth. It was planned to work with precision; and work it did, even down to later “news” and “revelations.”

Such is the nature of power here nowadays. Ruthless. Vicious. Treasonous. Worthy of a nice high speed chunk of lead delivered right through the cranium by a Patriot. But I digress again, sorry, folks for getting off track… it still upsets me, that day.

We can, if America is still really America, receive our proper justice for this horror without shots being fired. See the CIT website for explanations, complete expositions on all the evidence referenced in the film and full instructions on taking it to the politicoid, suit and parrothead lifeforms…

We are encouraged to freely download this, burn copies to DVD and send ’em off to politicians and media people with demands for action and justice. Sounds good to me!

Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis have compiled a most comprehensive film, one which completely annihilates the most ludicrous “conspiracy theory” ever thought up… namely, the official government one.

Citizen Investigation Team offers this compilation of independent verifiable evidence exposing the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon as a psychological black operation of deception.

Consider this a non-violent call to action as everyone is encouraged to copy and distribute this conclusive evidence to media, political, and authority figures while first requesting, and then demanding a response. Inaction by authorities and media to this information amounts to a crime of obstruction of justice so it’s time they are held accountable.

This is particularly the case as more innocents are slaughtered and additional billions of dollars are spent on a fraudulent “war on terror” perpetuated under any other name.

Please visit CitizenInvestigationTeam.com for full resources and a step-by-step strategy as to how you can take action on this critical life or death information.

The Pentagon part of the 9/11 case is an interesting one to be sure. Perhaps the best research to date has been done by the Citizen Investigation Team, who look at nothing else.* They’ve shown beyond doubt that the official line is, as expected, pure bunk. There was indeed a plane at the Pentagon, but it could not have hit the building, as the flight path simply would not allow it; and was in fact timed perfectly with the explosion at the building facade to cover it flying up and away. This path was seen and reported to CIT by a very reliable fellow. 

This video is about the famous cab that was supposedly speared by a flying light pole. Well. The plane could not have done that, as it wasn’t over there. Actually, a government fellow walked over to the scene snapping photos as he went… photos which clearly show that the poles only ‘arrived’ on scene later, although the damaged cab is there. Getting the picture? Good.

This is a trailer for the Eye of the Storm video, which I heartily suggest you watch, along with all the other material, including the full segments on Mr. England, the shall we say inexplicable damage to his car re the story told; and all the rest of it, which includes testimony from two Pentagon police officers. I must say that Mr. England is an interesting individual… as is his wife. See for yourself, though…

After you digest it all, you’ll have a better understanding of why we only got five frames of absolutely nothing… and insight into what that really means. Many thanks and much appreciation to Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis for what they’ve put together.

video description:
Cab driver Lloyde England admitted that the 9/11 operation was a “planned” event by the people with “all the money” and that he was involved. He tried shifting his position on the highway so it would make sense with the north side evidence proving the plane did not hit the light poles. But that is a proven deliberate lie since he had let it slip only minutes prior (without knowing he was being recorded) that he knew he was on the bridge, directly on the south side path. Yet when the camera started, he dogmatically maintained he was on the north side even when presented with photographs proving he was on the bridge. See the complete interviews with Lloyde here: thepentacon.com/eyeofthestorm.htm 

* – The forum has sections on the WTC and Shanksville.