Wow! Double Wow! Finally! The following excerpt is from an excellent article by Len Hart that I just found at his The Existentialist Cowboy blog.

Read the complete article. Seriously.

I am a strong supporter of the work that Craig Ranke and his Citizen Investigation Team (CIT) have done regarding events at the Pentagon. They’ve incontrovertibly shown that an airliner simply could not have hit the Pentagon and that the damage to the building concurs with that fact. They’ve also proven to my satisfaction that the ‘downed’ light poles and the ludicrous taxi incident were staged. Ranke feels that explosives in the building caused the damage and that no aircraft of any kind struck.

With what little evidence we have from the scene, along with Rumsfeld stating that a missile hit the building, my brain’s turning all kinds of ways…

It is within the realm of plausibility that the decoy plane seen up close and personal by the eyewitnesses interviewed by CIT, which was seen flying away behind the fireball by a witness they interviewed, was timed to coincide with the arrival of a device described by one person on the news that day as “a missile, with wings.” Keep in mind that none, yes, none, of the people heard from in the news coverage on that day were “regular guys,” but instead all employees of the media giants.

The article’s main story is the fact that American Airlines itself has finally told the truth, (in the most subtle way possible) and owned up to the fact that those flights so critical to the official story never happened.  Thank you AA for living up to your name. That’s huge. And without those planes being in the air, the entire government line falls to dust, just like the thousands of innocent people they killed in carrying out their sick “new Pearl Harbor.”

I like this Len Hart. He thinks like me and our attitudes seen similar in more than one area. Also covered in the article are many of the other aspects of 9/11 including the revelation by United Airlines on the day that the alleged Shanksville plane had landed in Cleveland, the towers, mainstream media’s apparent difficulty in keeping to the timeline of their scripts, and what we’d all like to see happen. There are a bunch of good comments and there’s a nice list of resources to cap it off.

Ready? Here you go…

THURSDAY, JULY 02, 2009

AA Exposes Bush’s ‘Big Lie’: Flight 11 DID NOT FLY on 911!

by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

American Airlines itself is the source for information that AA Flights 11 (North Tower) and 77 (Pentagon) did not fly on 911. These flights are critical to the the government’s crumbling cover up! Without those flights, Bush and his murderous co-conspirators will have to revise the big lie. They will have to concoct yet another cover story from the ground up! A cover up is on the brink of collapse when those guilty of capital crimes and high treason either turn on one another or are forced to revise the lie! If neither flight was in the air as American Airlines itself has so stated, then numerous ‘official versions’ of the ‘official conspiracy theory’ are all a pack of malicious lies. That includes almost every statement made by Bush. It is, in my opinion, probable cause to indict Bush and his co-conspirators for the crimes of mass murder and high treason.

WikiScanner discovered that American Airlines changed their Wikipedia entry to state that Flights 11 and 77 did not fly on 9/11. The original entry was as follows:

Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack: American Airlines Flight 77 (a Boeing 757) and American Airlines Flight 11 (a Boeing 767).

New entry is as follows and includes the bolded text below:

Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack: Flight 77 (a Boeing 757) and Flight 11 (a Boeing 767).

Although these flights were daily departures before and a month after September 11, 2001. Neither flight 11 nor 77 were scheduled on September 11, 2001. The records kept by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (www.bts.gov/gis/) do not list either flight that day. —Wikipedia

To make the point: the source for these change is American Airlines by making changes to Wikipedia. The ‘story’ is not Wiki. The story is not about Wiki. The story is about how AA ‘corrected’ a wiki entry. The story is about the fact that the evidence that Flights 11 and 77 were not flying on 911 comes from American Airlines itself.

According to a Freedom of Information Act reply from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), the last known pre-9/11 flights for three of the four aircraft involved in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 took place in December, 2000, nine months before the attacks, while no pre-9/11 final flight information was provided for American Airlines flight 77 (N644AA).

However, a searchable online BTS database produces the following search results for three of the four 9/11 aircraft on September 10, 2001:

AA 11 departs San Francisco (SFO): AA 09/10/2001 0198 (flight number) N334AA (tail number) BOS (destination) 22:04 (wheels-off time)

UA 175 departs San Francisco (SFO): UA 09/10/2001 0170 (flight number) N612UA (tail number) BOS (destination) 13:44 (wheels-off time)

UA 93 departs San Francisco (SFO): UA 09/10/2001 0078 (flight number) N591UA (tail number) EWR (destination) 23:15 (wheels-off time)–911 Blogger, UPDATE: U.S. BTS FOIA Records For 9/11 Planes Differ From BTS Online Database [The records were obtained by Adrian Monaghan]

Anyone trying to prove that Flights 77 and 11 were not flying on 911 would have to verify that proposition through authoritative sources that could confirm it. The question is raised: how do we know who made the changes to Wiki? Everyone logged on to the internet does so from an IP address. In this case, the IP is that of American Airlines. It’s traceable.

My own WHOIS lookup as well as a Google search of the IP address proves conclusively that it was –indeed –American Airlines itself that made the change. It is American Airlines –by way of Wiki –that has said that neither Flight 11 nor Flight 77 were in the air that day.

Therefore, the Bush theory of 911 is a deliberate lie. My look up returned the following: […]

Continue reading the article, as it gets ever so much deeper. Ever so much.

We must insist, and I mean insist, on bringing these heinous, treasonous, murdering thugs to justice. What they did not only ruined America, but ruined the whole damn world. I personally feel that Obama is just another Bush, working to further the criminal aims set forth before him… and so far his actions would seem to indicate just that. Maybe this will prompt him into foregoing his handler’s orders and boldly taking actions that We The People will be truly proud of.

Advertisements
Comments
  1. Susan says:

    Darn! That’s disturbing! I could see the possibility with that vehicle — confusing, fast, low-altitude, the white and red colors.

    But, what would have happened to flight 11? Where would it have gone and its passengers and crew?

    • iggymak says:

      Ah, dear Susan, many ask about the passengers and their fate… and American Airlines seems to have cleared this up regarding their planes on that day, by correcting the Wikipedia article to reflect the fact that those two flights did not happen… hence… for AA, there were no passengers.

      Perhaps I shouldn’t have concentrated on the missile, as that’s what caught my eye… I pretty well knew that the flights were of a phantom nature so I was most pleased to see AA live up to the word American in their name. My thinking was that the arrogant evil of that particular Global Hawk bit would compel people to click on to read Len Hart’s whole piece, (hasn’t worked too well, people are so damn lazy) which is much more to do with the admission by the airline that their birds didn’t fly. There was much evidence for that but this is confirmation right from the horse’s mouth.

      It disturbs me to this day and it hurts to think that they’ll all get away with it since people who give a damn are in such a minority.

      Thanks, Susan. Keep digging for the truth!

  2. good Ol Dave says:

    If people looking at this photo can’t see right away that this is a doctored photo, then they have to be as gullible as hell. Global Hawks are some 45 feet long, only half the size of how it’s depicted here, plus they have V tails, which is doctored here to make it look like there’s only a single rudder.

    It’s one thing for the truthers to want to imagine some secret gov’t conspiracy is behind 9/11, but manufacturing blatantly fabricated photos like this in order to trick other people into believing what they want people to believe is LYING, and lying is a de facto admission that they know what they’re saying is false.

    BS artists are still BS artists, regardless of what side of the debate they’re on.

    • iggymak says:

      Just wanted to note for the readers that “good Ol Dave” is a professional Official Story supporter and debunker assigned to the Above Top Secret site. He only posts Official Story supporting comments, 645 of them to date, alwys using standard debunker tactics. He’s never started a thread.

      This post was featured in a recent ATS thread, wherein it was vilified, and received almost 200 hits originating from there, but hardly any bothered to click through and read the story at the Existentialist Cowboy site that was the whole point of this post.

      The photo could certainly be false… don’t care if it is, really, it’s symbolic of the murders of the day, the treason, the evil in the hearts of the perpetrators that people like Dave here try to protect by repeating the same stuff in every single 9/11 post at ATS.

      The point was that AMERICAN AIRLINES stated that “their two” never flew that day.

  3. […] to the somewhat questionable photo that I featured in fully heated enthusiasm in my old post AA Exposes Bush’s ‘Big Lie’: Flight 11 DID NOT FLY on 911! Credence lending to thoughts and postulations on that part of the puzzle, as well, perhaps, of the […]

  4. iggymak says:

    Every time I draw attention to a sidebar item things backfire. Consequently, this thread has finally been modified to remove the confusion that ensued due to the off topic content it had contained. Not that it will help much.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s