Posts Tagged ‘Citizen Investigation Team’

Wow! Double Wow! Finally! The following excerpt is from an excellent article by Len Hart that I just found at his The Existentialist Cowboy blog.

Read the complete article. Seriously.

I am a strong supporter of the work that Craig Ranke and his Citizen Investigation Team (CIT) have done regarding events at the Pentagon. They’ve incontrovertibly shown that an airliner simply could not have hit the Pentagon and that the damage to the building concurs with that fact. They’ve also proven to my satisfaction that the ‘downed’ light poles and the ludicrous taxi incident were staged. Ranke feels that explosives in the building caused the damage and that no aircraft of any kind struck.

With what little evidence we have from the scene, along with Rumsfeld stating that a missile hit the building, my brain’s turning all kinds of ways…

It is within the realm of plausibility that the decoy plane seen up close and personal by the eyewitnesses interviewed by CIT, which was seen flying away behind the fireball by a witness they interviewed, was timed to coincide with the arrival of a device described by one person on the news that day as “a missile, with wings.” Keep in mind that none, yes, none, of the people heard from in the news coverage on that day were “regular guys,” but instead all employees of the media giants.

The article’s main story is the fact that American Airlines itself has finally told the truth, (in the most subtle way possible) and owned up to the fact that those flights so critical to the official story never happened.  Thank you AA for living up to your name. That’s huge. And without those planes being in the air, the entire government line falls to dust, just like the thousands of innocent people they killed in carrying out their sick “new Pearl Harbor.”

I like this Len Hart. He thinks like me and our attitudes seen similar in more than one area. Also covered in the article are many of the other aspects of 9/11 including the revelation by United Airlines on the day that the alleged Shanksville plane had landed in Cleveland, the towers, mainstream media’s apparent difficulty in keeping to the timeline of their scripts, and what we’d all like to see happen. There are a bunch of good comments and there’s a nice list of resources to cap it off.

Ready? Here you go…


AA Exposes Bush’s ‘Big Lie’: Flight 11 DID NOT FLY on 911!

by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

American Airlines itself is the source for information that AA Flights 11 (North Tower) and 77 (Pentagon) did not fly on 911. These flights are critical to the the government’s crumbling cover up! Without those flights, Bush and his murderous co-conspirators will have to revise the big lie. They will have to concoct yet another cover story from the ground up! A cover up is on the brink of collapse when those guilty of capital crimes and high treason either turn on one another or are forced to revise the lie! If neither flight was in the air as American Airlines itself has so stated, then numerous ‘official versions’ of the ‘official conspiracy theory’ are all a pack of malicious lies. That includes almost every statement made by Bush. It is, in my opinion, probable cause to indict Bush and his co-conspirators for the crimes of mass murder and high treason.

WikiScanner discovered that American Airlines changed their Wikipedia entry to state that Flights 11 and 77 did not fly on 9/11. The original entry was as follows:

Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack: American Airlines Flight 77 (a Boeing 757) and American Airlines Flight 11 (a Boeing 767).

New entry is as follows and includes the bolded text below:

Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack: Flight 77 (a Boeing 757) and Flight 11 (a Boeing 767).

Although these flights were daily departures before and a month after September 11, 2001. Neither flight 11 nor 77 were scheduled on September 11, 2001. The records kept by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics ( do not list either flight that day. —Wikipedia

To make the point: the source for these change is American Airlines by making changes to Wikipedia. The ‘story’ is not Wiki. The story is not about Wiki. The story is about how AA ‘corrected’ a wiki entry. The story is about the fact that the evidence that Flights 11 and 77 were not flying on 911 comes from American Airlines itself.

According to a Freedom of Information Act reply from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), the last known pre-9/11 flights for three of the four aircraft involved in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 took place in December, 2000, nine months before the attacks, while no pre-9/11 final flight information was provided for American Airlines flight 77 (N644AA).

However, a searchable online BTS database produces the following search results for three of the four 9/11 aircraft on September 10, 2001:

AA 11 departs San Francisco (SFO): AA 09/10/2001 0198 (flight number) N334AA (tail number) BOS (destination) 22:04 (wheels-off time)

UA 175 departs San Francisco (SFO): UA 09/10/2001 0170 (flight number) N612UA (tail number) BOS (destination) 13:44 (wheels-off time)

UA 93 departs San Francisco (SFO): UA 09/10/2001 0078 (flight number) N591UA (tail number) EWR (destination) 23:15 (wheels-off time)–911 Blogger, UPDATE: U.S. BTS FOIA Records For 9/11 Planes Differ From BTS Online Database [The records were obtained by Adrian Monaghan]

Anyone trying to prove that Flights 77 and 11 were not flying on 911 would have to verify that proposition through authoritative sources that could confirm it. The question is raised: how do we know who made the changes to Wiki? Everyone logged on to the internet does so from an IP address. In this case, the IP is that of American Airlines. It’s traceable.

My own WHOIS lookup as well as a Google search of the IP address proves conclusively that it was –indeed –American Airlines itself that made the change. It is American Airlines –by way of Wiki –that has said that neither Flight 11 nor Flight 77 were in the air that day.

Therefore, the Bush theory of 911 is a deliberate lie. My look up returned the following: […]

Continue reading the article, as it gets ever so much deeper. Ever so much.

We must insist, and I mean insist, on bringing these heinous, treasonous, murdering thugs to justice. What they did not only ruined America, but ruined the whole damn world. I personally feel that Obama is just another Bush, working to further the criminal aims set forth before him… and so far his actions would seem to indicate just that. Maybe this will prompt him into foregoing his handler’s orders and boldly taking actions that We The People will be truly proud of.

The Pentagon part of the 9/11 case is an interesting one to be sure. Perhaps the best research to date has been done by the Citizen Investigation Team, who look at nothing else.* They’ve shown beyond doubt that the official line is, as expected, pure bunk. There was indeed a plane at the Pentagon, but it could not have hit the building, as the flight path simply would not allow it; and was in fact timed perfectly with the explosion at the building facade to cover it flying up and away. This path was seen and reported to CIT by a very reliable fellow. 

This video is about the famous cab that was supposedly speared by a flying light pole. Well. The plane could not have done that, as it wasn’t over there. Actually, a government fellow walked over to the scene snapping photos as he went… photos which clearly show that the poles only ‘arrived’ on scene later, although the damaged cab is there. Getting the picture? Good.

This is a trailer for the Eye of the Storm video, which I heartily suggest you watch, along with all the other material, including the full segments on Mr. England, the shall we say inexplicable damage to his car re the story told; and all the rest of it, which includes testimony from two Pentagon police officers. I must say that Mr. England is an interesting individual… as is his wife. See for yourself, though…

After you digest it all, you’ll have a better understanding of why we only got five frames of absolutely nothing… and insight into what that really means. Many thanks and much appreciation to Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis for what they’ve put together.

video description:
Cab driver Lloyde England admitted that the 9/11 operation was a “planned” event by the people with “all the money” and that he was involved. He tried shifting his position on the highway so it would make sense with the north side evidence proving the plane did not hit the light poles. But that is a proven deliberate lie since he had let it slip only minutes prior (without knowing he was being recorded) that he knew he was on the bridge, directly on the south side path. Yet when the camera started, he dogmatically maintained he was on the north side even when presented with photographs proving he was on the bridge. See the complete interviews with Lloyde here: 

* – The forum has sections on the WTC and Shanksville.